Anderson subsequently sued Farmers, alleging the insurer and its brokers failed to guard Gibson’s pursuits, acted in unhealthy religion, and prioritized their very own monetary considerations over Gibson’s. She claimed Farmers didn’t negotiate in good religion, didn’t allocate fault to different entities, and didn’t adequately assist Gibson’s protection. Anderson’s criticism additionally said that Farmers dealt with Gibson’s legal responsibility claims for indemnity and protection by means of adjusters and attorneys who have been staff or brokers of Farmers, regardless of alleged conflicts of curiosity.
