After the accident, Zeigler’s partner filed a employees’ compensation declare. ESSG, Atlas, and BRF every denied duty, and the matter was appealed to the Staff’ Compensation Board. The board, following a three-day listening to earlier than an administrative regulation decide, discovered that ESSG was the accountable employer. The board primarily based its resolution on the discovering that ESSG, by way of Atlas, was conscious of Zeigler’s placement at BRF’s mission, paid his wages, and picked up service charges. These actions have been enough to determine an implied-in-fact contract between ESSG and BRF, making ESSG answerable for employees’ compensation advantages.
