GAO Warns of Future FAFSA Failures After Botched Launch

In a pair of scathing reviews, the U.S. Authorities Accountability Workplace (GAO) has revealed the vital missteps taken by the Division of Schooling throughout final 12 months’s Free Software for Federal Scholar Help (FAFSA) rollout. 

The reviews, launched at this time (you’ll find them right here and right here), particulars how systemic failures within the Division’s planning, communication, and testing led to a disastrous implementation of the brand new FAFSA type, which has left hundreds of thousands of scholars and households struggling to entry important monetary assist. One report focuses on the technical implementation of the simplified FAFSA type and the opposite on the monetary assist side of the FAFSA rollout.

The findings additionally elevate alarms concerning the upcoming FAFSA cycle for the 2025-2026 educational 12 months, with GAO officers warning that until important reforms are made, comparable points might come up. Officers from the GAO can be testifying at this time earlier than the Home Subcommittee on Greater Schooling to debate the suggestions specified by their report.

Missed Warnings And Delayed Motion

The GAO report describes a sample of warning indicators that had been ignored by the Division of Schooling and the Workplace of Federal Scholar Help (FSA), the company tasked with managing FAFSA.

In response to the report, by August 2022, FSA officers had already adjusted their schedules for the 2024–2025 FAFSA cycle, pushing contractor deadlines from October to December 2023. But it wasn’t till March 2023 that they publicly admitted to the delay, a transfer that disrupted school planning timelines for college kids throughout the nation.

Regardless of these warning indicators, FSA launched the brand new FAFSA type in December 2023 with out adequately addressing main system deficiencies.The end result to households was that even when the shape launched on December 28, many households could not file the shape till as late as March 2024.

The GAO revealed that 18 out of 25 key system necessities, together with the power to finalize assist eligibility and distribute outcomes to varsities, had not been met earlier than launch. These delays in processing led to prolonged wait occasions and created important obstacles for college kids and households attempting to use for monetary assist.

Buyer Service Points

The GAO report additionally highlighted the extent that households struggled to get help.

Through the first 5 months of the applying interval, the Division of Schooling’s name heart acquired greater than 5 million calls—4 million of which went unanswered (that is 74% of calls went unanswered).

With fewer name heart workers than in earlier years and 200,000 fewer calls answered in comparison with the prior FAFSA cycle, the system buckled below the quantity of inquiries.

The GAO report highlights this customer support failure as a vital concern, stating that many households had been left with out steerage on resolving technical issues. The FAFSA web site typically left college students to “strive once more later” when confronted with errors, including confusion and additional delaying their capacity to finish functions.

One of the crucial important communication breakdowns concerned the failure to tell over 500,000 college students that their federal assist estimates had modified as a result of corrections in calculation errors.

Technical Failures

The Division of Schooling’s failure to correctly check the brand new FAFSA processing system compounded the difficulties. A number of technical errors endured properly after the shape’s launch, with many households counting on incorrect monetary assist estimates to make essential school choices. These “unresolved defects” had been categorized by the GAO as among the many most damaging facets of the failed rollout, eroding public belief within the FAFSA system and federal monetary assist.

In a single vital defect found post-launch, the system overestimated some college students’ assist eligibility by failing to think about household property, an error that left many college students scrambling to regulate their school plans on the final minute.

The report additionally factors to extreme management deficiencies inside the Division of Schooling, notably in its Workplace of the Chief Info Officer (CIO). The workplace, which is liable for overseeing IT initiatives like FAFSA, had six completely different CIOs for the reason that FAFSA overhaul started in 2021. In response to the GAO, this lack of constant management hindered efficient oversight and contributed to the mismanagement of the challenge.

Suggestions For The Future

The GAO has made six suggestions to the Division of Schooling on the know-how entrance to keep away from a repeat of this 12 months’s errors. In addition they made seven suggestions to the Division of Schooling to enhance the precise FAFSA course of primarily based on this 12 months’s issues. These suggestions embody:

1. Establish and join with college students who didn’t submit a FAFSA utility this cycle (2024-25) as a result of delays and technical points, and to supply them with the data they should apply throughout the upcoming cycle (2025-26).
2. The Chief Working Officer of the Workplace of Federal Scholar Help ought to assessment the FAFSA utility course of to determine methods to cut back the burden on college students and households by addressing the remaining technical points and streamlining the method for dad or mum or partner contributors to cut back the overall time it takes to finish the FAFSA type.
3. The Chief Working Officer of the Workplace of Federal Scholar Help ought to overhaul its submission course of for college kids whose dad or mum or partner contributors shouldn’t have Social Safety numbers to handle extra
   utility boundaries.
4. The Chief Working Officer of the Workplace of Federal Scholar Help ought to enhance translation companies by offering a transparent path to help for languages aside from English and Spanish by way of the decision heart menu
   and progress towards making the FAFSA utility accessible in languages aside from English and Spanish.
5. The Workplace of Federal Scholar Help ought to plan for and guarantee hiring of ample workers to extend capability on the Federal Scholar Help Info Heart name heart to have the ability to meet name demand and enhance customer support.
6. The Chief Working Officer of the Workplace of Federal Scholar Help ought to develop a complete plan for offering FAFSA candidates with well timed updates on the standing of their utility and options to technical
   boundaries.
7. The Chief Working Officer of the Workplace of Federal Scholar Help ought to develop insurance policies to speak key milestones of the 2025-26 FAFSA and future cycles to schools and stakeholders in a well timed and dependable
   method.

With out addressing these systemic points, the report warns, the 2025-2026 FAFSA cycle is more likely to face comparable delays and technical challenges.

Richard Cordray, former Chief Working Officer of the FSA, resigned in April following backlash over the troubled rollout. The Division has since introduced a December 2024 launch for the following FAFSA type, pushing again the timeline to permit for additional testing and enhancements. Nevertheless, as college students and schools put together for the following utility cycle, the GAO’s report casts doubt on whether or not sufficient has been achieved to stop one other chaotic 12 months for monetary assist candidates.

The Division of Schooling is predicted to reply to the GAO’s suggestions within the coming weeks as scrutiny from Congress intensifies. With hundreds of thousands of scholars relying on FAFSA to afford school, it is necessary that the Division of Schooling resolves these points rapidly.

Do not Miss These Different Tales: