With the 2025 tax season now behind us, it might be price your time over the summer time months to log in to your Canada Income Company account to view all the 2025 T-slips that the CRA has on file so that you can be sure that you’ve totally captured, and reported, your entire earnings for 2025. That is notably essential for many who filed early, particularly when you used CRA’s auto-fill function earlier than all of your slips confirmed up on-line . The aim is to catch any earnings omissions and regulate your return , earlier than the company catches you in CRA’s annual matching program .
Failure to report earnings, even when it’s the results of a purely harmless mistake, can provide rise to penalties and curiosity. That’s what occurred to at least one taxpayer who appeared earlier than the federal courtroom in Vancouver in late Might, looking for a judicial overview of a choice of the CRA denying her request for reduction from penalties and curiosity.
Earlier than delving into the info of the case, let’s overview the foundations for omitting earnings. Beneath the Revenue Tax Act , when you fail to report a minimum of $500 of earnings in a tax yr, and in any of the three previous taxation years , you might be hit with a “repeated failure to report earnings” federal penalty. That is calculated because the lesser of 10 per cent of the unreported earnings, and 50 per cent of the distinction between the understatement of tax (or the overstatement of tax credit) associated to the omission, and the quantity of any tax paid in respect of the unreported quantity, for instance, by an employer by way of supply deductions withheld. A corresponding provincial 10 per cent penalty can be usually assessed.
For instance, when you forgot to report greater than $500 of earnings you acquired in 2025, and in addition forgot to report greater than $500 in earnings in any of your 2022, 2023 or 2024 returns, you might be hit with this failure-to-report penalty.
Within the current case, the taxpayer filed her 2021 earnings tax return in early March 2022. She failed to incorporate two T5 slips from TD Waterhouse and Equitable Financial institution that she says she acquired solely after she had filed her return. Upon noticing this omission, the CRA reassessed her however didn’t impose a penalty.
Sadly, an analogous scenario arose in 2023 when the taxpayer filed her 2022 earnings tax return in late March 2023, however inadvertently omitted T5 slips from TD Waterhouse, claiming the slips weren’t obtainable on the CRA’s auto-fill service when she used industrial software program to arrange her return. For the 2022 tax yr, her undeclared earnings was greater than $23,000. She was subsequently reassessed by the CRA in October 2023, and a penalty of $2,925 was utilized, together with $636 in non-deductible arrears curiosity.
After receiving her reassessment discover, with the penalty and curiosity, the taxpayer utilized to the CRA beneath the taxpayer reduction provisions of the Act. Three successive selections have been made, by completely different CRA officers, denying her request for reduction. The current judicial overview surrounded the third resolution during which the CRA officer had famous that the company had acquired the omitted slips earlier than the top of February 2023. It had processed them in April 2023, in order that they’d have been obtainable to the taxpayer earlier than the deadline to file her 2022 earnings tax return, being April 30, 2023.
In the course of the six months that elapsed between the second the slips have been obtainable and the time that CRA reassessed the taxpayer, the taxpayer did not appropriate the omission. Because the CRA officer wrote, “This was not a scenario past her management, particularly as a result of she communicated a number of occasions with the CRA to ask for different changes to be made to her return throughout this era.”
The CRA officer went on to say that even when the taxpayer hadn’t acquired the mandatory slips earlier than April 30, she ought to have estimated her earnings based mostly on statements from her monetary establishment which present the earnings earned through the yr. Consequently, the CRA denied her request for reduction, so the taxpayer turned to courtroom .
As in prior such circumstances, the function of the federal courtroom is proscribed in that it doesn’t have the discretion to vary the CRA’s resolution merely as a result of the decide disagrees with it. Quite, the federal courtroom can solely intervene if the taxpayer exhibits that the choice was “unreasonable.”
In courtroom, the taxpayer argued that she acted “diligently and in good religion,” and that her failure to declare sure quantities in her earnings was as a result of fault of her monetary establishment’s failure to concern her digital T5 slips in time. She argued that taxpayers must be notified when new info turns into obtainable on the CRA’s auto-fill service, in any other case, how are they to know if a brand new slip was later added?
The decide famous that each one these elements have been, certainly, thought of by the CRA when making its resolution to disclaim curiosity and penalty reduction, however the CRA officer concluded that numerous different elements, such because the magnitude of the quantity omitted, and the truth that this was the second time the taxpayer did not report earnings, “tipped the scales in favour of denying reduction.”
Because the decide reminded us, “It’s at all times the accountability of the taxpayer to file an correct earnings tax return. … Even when they use industrial software program or the CRA’s auto-fill function, taxpayers should be sure that all their earnings is asserted. It’s cheap to count on taxpayers to have data of their sources of earnings.”
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com .
When you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
