On this episode of Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing, Motley Idiot contributors Jon Quast, Matt Frankel, and Rachel Warren focus on:
-
Nvidia’s new Vera CPU.
-
The potential fallout within the CPU markout.
-
Berkshire Hathaway’s newest acquisition.
-
Passive investing’s influence on the inventory market.
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Idiot’s free podcasts, try our podcast heart. Whenever you’re prepared to take a position, try this prime 10 record of shares to purchase.
Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our workforce simply launched a report on the one little-known firm, referred to as an “Indispensable Monopoly” offering the vital know-how Nvidia and Intel each want. Proceed »
A full transcript is under.
Must you purchase inventory in Nvidia proper now?
Before you purchase inventory in Nvidia, think about this:
The Motley Idiot Inventory Advisor analyst workforce simply recognized what they consider are the 10 finest shares for traders to purchase now… and Nvidia wasn’t certainly one of them. The ten shares that made the reduce are constructed for long-term progress and will produce monster returns within the coming years.
Contemplate when Netflix made this record on December 17, 2004… in case you invested $1,000 on the time of our advice, you’d have $443,191!* Or when Nvidia made this record on April 15, 2005… in case you invested $1,000 on the time of our advice, you’d have $1,258,838!*
That efficiency is why individuals pay attention. With a observe document of beating the S&P 500 by 4x, Inventory Advisor gives a definite benefit. Do not miss the newest prime 10 record, obtainable with Inventory Advisor, and be a part of an investing group constructed for the lengthy haul.
*Inventory Advisor returns as of June 6, 2026.
This podcast was recorded on June 1, 2026.
Jon Quast: What’s Nvidia’s subsequent large progress lever? You are listening to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. Welcome to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. My title is Jon Quast, and I am joined as we speak by Silly contributors, Rachel Warren and Matt Frankel. Now we have a few issues to speak about on the present as we speak. We will speak about passive investing. We will speak about a deal within the homebuilder market.
However first, we’ll speak concerning the bell of the ball, and that’s Nvidia. Nvidia over the weekend in Taipei, having a convention occasion the place they announce many issues as they wish to do. However one of many large bulletins popping out from Nvidia over the weekend was its new Vera CPU. Now, I do know full effectively that Nvidia isn’t a hidden firm. It is the biggest publicly traded firm on this planet. However the enterprise has boomed with GPUs, or these graphic processing models. That is an announcement for a CPU, a central processing unit, and that is not an space that Nvidia dominates. Truly, that house is dominated by AMD and Intel, and we’ll get to that aspect of the story right here in only a second. However first, let’s speak about this, Matt. What’s Nvidia’s pitch to its prospects right here on why it ought to doubtlessly change to its personal CPUs as an alternative of that of opponents?
Matt Frankel: At a excessive stage, this new chip combines certainly one of Nvidia’s Blackwell GPUs, which you could find in PCs as we speak with an arm architecture-based CPU designed by an organization referred to as Mediatech which Nvidia is partnering on to make this. It is clearly designed to deal with AI workloads higher than the processors that you simply see from Intel and AMD, which personal over 90% of the market as we speak. Nvidia claims, for instance, it will ship RTX-class gaming, which is the high-end gaming PCs that you have in all probability seen at Finest Purchase and issues like that, in very skinny Home windows laptops. It is a part of Nvidia’s collaboration with Microsoft. I do know it is actually robust to maintain observe of all Nvidia’s varied collaborations happening proper now, however I made one with Microsoft to primarily reinvent the PC, and that is a part of that. It is designed to be a high-end processor. That is the key phrase. This is not the $400 laptops, designed for avid players and professionals who actually need the flexibility to multitask and do advanced workloads.
Rachel Warren: I believe these are actually good factors that Matt makes. However I believe as effectively to observe up on that Nvidia’s making this pitch with the Vera CP actually making an attempt to essentially change what a CPO is meant to do on this more and more agentic period of AI. One of many issues right here as effectively to notice is Nvidia’s primarily telling information heart purchasers that their outdated structure has grow to be a large bottleneck. You consider how highly effective GPUs deal with the core considering of AI, autonomous brokers additionally have to execute code, search databases, and actually handle these multistep loops. We’re in a time the place legacy CPUs, they crumble beneath that heavy coordination workload, and it leaves these very costly GPUs ready round idly. Nvidia is pitching what is actually a specialised visitors controller that runs these agentic environments virtually two occasions sooner than conventional options. I believe that is one thing else that is actually necessary to remove from this announcement.
Jon Quast: I wish to go just a little bit extra Hidden Gems right here beneath the floor, as we speak about this. Each Matt and Rachel alluding to this. Not all CPUs are created equal. Intel and AMD, as Matt identified, 90% of the market, primarily, possibly even just a little bit increased than that, however it’s constructed on a sure structure that many people, together with myself, do not usually take into consideration. It is not one thing that’s proper there on the floor, however it’s utilizing that X86 structure, and mainly, it is utterly totally different the way in which that Nvidia’s approaching it, approaching it with the structure. I believe that previously, traders have at all times considered AMD and Intel as this defensible moat right here as a result of its prospects must change the structure. They cannot simply plug in Nvidia’s CPUs, and it is apples for Apple’s change. No, you are additionally altering the structure that goes behind that. However as you identified, Rachel, these extra agentic workflows. That is the massive pattern in AI, the third wave, as Jensen Huang referred to as it. These AI brokers, it is creating exponential enhance in want for the CPUs. That is actually what it is making an attempt to deal with right here. I do not know. Guys, what do you assume? Is that this one thing that’s really going to trigger prospects to change from AMD, Intel to a extra ARM-based structure, Matt, what do you assume?
Matt Frankel: Sure and no. A minimum of initially, that is going to be a really high-end product. It is actually necessary to level out what we do not know but. One factor we do not know but is pricing. We do not understand how a lot that is going to value. If laptops with this chip value $2,500, they’re solely going to seize a really small a part of the market. It is also price mentioning we haven’t any real-world efficiency information from these chips but, solely what Nvidia says. There isn’t any third-party information or something like that like now we have for Intel’s and AMD’s. In the meanwhile, I actually see this chip fulfilling a distinct segment, not capturing an enormous share of the PC market. I nonetheless see AMD and Intel as having a reasonably defensible moat, primarily a duopoly within the CPU house for PCs. Qualcomm already has an ARM structure processor within the PC market. It is obtainable in dozens of laptop computer and PC fashions. Few individuals even notice that I did not notice it till I went to buy a brand new laptop computer a pair weeks in the past. Qualcomm says it has a ten% share of the $800 plus U.S. Home windows laptop computer market. That is not the lion’s share of the laptop computer market. Most individuals who purchase laptops spend lower than $800. In actuality, they’ve a low single-digit share of this market. Nvidia has its title. It does have that going for it, however it’s going to be a really high-end product at first, and I may see a single-digit share, no less than within the subsequent few years.
Rachel Warren: I do not assume it is a winner-takes-all state of affairs, and I additionally assume it is turning into more and more clear that Nvidia is de facto carving out its personal path inside this market. That being mentioned, I believe traders available in the market for a very long time have considered Intel and AMD’s structure as this unbreachable moat. As a result of rewriting legacy enterprise software program to run on ARM chips was a multimillion-dollar endeavor, if no more. However Nvidia is actually bypassing this barrier. They’re concentrating on what’s the more and more multibillion-dollar infrastructure constructed completely for AI factories, which I alluded to earlier, moderately than combating to exchange legacy enterprise databases. Nvidia is actually carving their very own path ahead. A whole lot of that is being made inevitable by the way in which they’re leveraging their AI ecosystem monopoly. The arm-based Vera CPU, it comes actually tightly built-in into the hyper-advanced through Rubin platforms through proprietary connection. When you’re a Cloud supplier or Titan like OpenAI, like Anthropic, you are making an attempt to pressure a standard processor into this unified system may drastically destroy computing velocity. By integrating Vera flawlessly with their new Vera Rubin tremendous chips, and Vidas primarily providing a totally unified ecosystem, and that would create a extremely sturdy benefit for them on this house trying forward over the subsequent a number of years.
Jon Quast: Let’s simply get to the underside line right here as we shut out this matter. After Nvidia’s announcement right here for the Vera CPU, are you fearful for Intel and/or AMD? Matt, you go first.
Matt Frankel: For AMD, probably not. For 2 large causes. For No. 1, AMD CPUs are meant for the lots, not simply hardcore players and multitaskers, artistic professionals. You may get a terrific AMD processor and a laptop computer for about $500, $600 proper now. Second, CPUs have gotten a lot much less of the bull case for AMD. It has large momentum within the information heart house proper now. For PCs and laptops, it is nonetheless an enormous a part of the enterprise, extra so than Nvidia, however it’s not an enormous a part of the expansion thesis anymore, particularly prefer it was. With Intel, the jury’s nonetheless out. That inventory has run up a lot, however it’s actually primarily based on future potential, not any gross sales that it is producing up to now. In the meanwhile, Intel’s income is closely reliant on its CPU enterprise. I believe so far as income goes, Intel may very well be essentially the most impacted right here, however will the market care inventory price-wise? In all probability not, due to all of that future potential making.
Jon Quast: Rachel, how about you?
Rachel Warren: I believe, no less than within the close to time period, that is true by way of how share costs will reply. I believe it is also necessary to notice Nvidia, they’re projecting $20 billion in CPU income this fiscal yr. They’re aiming to seize a good portion of the server CPU market. We have already got unbiased benchmarks which might be exhibiting that their customized design outperforms Intel’s flagship designed by over 55%. It edges out AMD’s prime chip by 11% in uncooked enterprise workloads. The concept right here is that by eliminating a few of the latency delays brought on by AMD and Intel’s multi-chiplet setups that Nvidia can actually problem that historic efficiency monopoly that their chips have held for many years. What that appears like in the long term, I believe, nonetheless stays to be seen, however I believe traders have additionally realized that it is a mistake to guess towards the success of Nvidia. The aggressive panorama could be very a lot shifting, and Nvidia is de facto leveraging importantly. I believe this is likely one of the largest takeaways. They’re leveraging the Vera CPU to actually push for full vertical integration. If a knowledge heart needs the hyper-advanced Vera Rubin platform, they’ve to purchase a whole proprietary package deal. The Rubin GPUs and the Vera CPUs bundled collectively, and I believe that is going to additionally create numerous progress tailwinds.
Jon Quast: After the break, we’ll be speaking about one of many world’s largest financial institution accounts. It is really lastly spending some cash. You are listening to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing.
ADVERTISEMENT: It is not simply that firms grow to be too large to fail, and we bail them out, though that is taking place. It is not simply they grow to be too large to jail, however they grow to be too large to care. These firms, they eradicated the competitors. They and their advisors, the economists who mentioned monopolies are good and environment friendly. They’re as we speak simply absolved of all duty. Procuring actually laborious would not clear up monopolies. We warned them on the time. They did it anyway. The Ishigogenic coverage atmosphere is what created this. To listen to why the Web retains getting worse, try episode 1280 of the Jordan Harbinger present.
Jon Quast: Welcome again to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. Berkshire Hathaway. I do know that is additionally not a hidden firm. That is $1 trillion conglomerate. However over the weekend, it introduced that it’s buying a homebuilder, that is Taylor Morrison, for $8.5 billion. I believe that is the entire enterprise worth of the deal. That is really the biggest deal that Berkshire has made because it purchased OxyChemical final yr for 9.7 billion. Now, 8.5 billion in relation to how a lot money Berkshire has. It is virtually a rounding error, however comparatively talking, it is a large deal and one of many larger ones from Berkshire shortly. I believe it is actually attention-grabbing as a result of many traders on the market are promoting shares of Dwelling Builders as of late.
Rachel Warren: It’s. It is also notable. It is the primary main acquisition engineered by Buffett’s successor, CEO Greg Abel. It is one thing of a countercyclical guess proper now on the present macro atmosphere. However I believe what I take away from that is Berkshire is capitalizing on what continues to be a really long-term structural actuality. America is going through a large multi-year backlog of housing demand. Clearly, that has been suppressed by excessive rates of interest. However within the lifespan of the market, it is a short-term blip on the radar. What’s attention-grabbing taking Taylor Morrison non-public on this buy they don’t seem to be simply shopping for a builder throughout 350 communities, which is notable, however they’re additionally absorbing a really profitable inside monetary companies arm. That arm supplies in-house mortgages, titles, insurance coverage. It plugs very well into their current housing large Clayton Houses. As you famous, Jon, very a lot leveraging this unmatched money hoard that they’ve on their stability sheet. They’re shopping for a top-tier builder at low cost. I believe that they’re making an attempt to place themselves to dominate that inevitable development upcycle when it comes.
Matt Frankel: It is a contrarian play for certain, however it’s one which I like. I’ve mentioned many occasions on these reveals. I am an enormous fan of the homebuilding house from a long-term perspective. Even with the premium Berkshires paying for Taylor Morrison, I believe it was like virtually 30% above the share value, it is nonetheless getting it at one thing like eight occasions EBITDA. To be clear, the homebuilding trade is horrible proper now. I am unable to actually stress that sufficient. There are greater than 500,000 unsold properties being held by builders proper now. That’s the most that we have seen because the monetary disaster period. Gross sales are sluggish, mortgage charges are excessive. Builders are having to closely incentivize consumers to maneuver homes. However the long-term bull case is compelling. There is a scarcity of about 4 million properties in america proper now. About 1,000,000 of these could be single-family models like Taylor Morrison produces. There’s pent-up demand from consumers and sellers who’re primarily really feel caught in place by excessive mortgage charges or sideline, simply priced out because of excessive mortgage charges. There are glorious profitability economics in homebuilding proper now, even in spite of everything these incentives I discussed, because of all that dwelling value appreciation we have seen since 2019, 2020. I actually like this spot long-term.
Jon Quast: I believe that Berkshire Hathaway, I believe that is truthful to say, is something however a momentum dealer. If Berkshire was going with momentum, it may be shopping for a CPU inventory proper now, however undoubtedly the Dwelling Builders are down. It is on the lookout for worth, and it is taking that contrarian guess right here. Warren Buffett, after all, he is now not accountable for the decision-making, however Warren Buffett as soon as mentioned, we’re prepared to look silly so long as we do not really feel now we have acted foolishly. I believe that is an attention-grabbing factor right here. Many traders look to Berkshire Hathaway. What’s it doing? Berkshire Hathaway may look silly for a short time right here, however do you assume it is acted foolishly in buying a homebuilder, Rachel?
Rachel Warren: Oh, I do not assume so. I do not assume they’re appearing foolishly right here in any respect. I really assume that is actually a textbook instance of the actually core worth investing ideas that constructed Berkshire to what it is vitally a lot goes again to the mindset of, after all, the good Warren Buffett when it got here to investing in value-oriented companies. I believe we regularly see the short-term markets. They have a tendency to panic over short-term macro situations, and understandably so. However I believe Berkshire’s very a lot considering in many years. They’re capitalizing on a large and plain structural scarcity of American housing. Paying $72.50 a share for a really worthwhile nationwide developer. That is primarily permitting Greg Abel to deploy a small fraction of Berkshire’s money phrase, which is about 400 billion, I believe, ultimately depend in a enterprise that actually matches completely into their current housing ecosystem. I will word, Buffett himself actively praised Abel’s execution on the deal. He emphasised it was accomplished smoother and sooner than he may have managed. I believe that is as a lot of a Buffett stamp of approval as one may hope for, and in addition appears to very a lot converse to the general technique of CEO Greg Abel.
Matt Frankel: Only one fast factor. I would not be stunned if there have been extra homebuilders in Berkshire’s acquisition pipeline. Consider the opposite actual property enterprise that has Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices. There are a bunch of various smaller ones consolidated into that. It is completely potential with this deal that Berkshire may look silly for some time. If mortgage charges rise even additional, for instance, which given the place inflation is true now’s completely potential, the housing market may get even slower within the close to time period. I consider the final course of mortgage charges and rates of interest basically over the subsequent few years goes to be decrease. That does not imply it will be a straight line. To be clear, I am prepared to briefly look silly alongside Berkshire. Dwelling Builders are one of many largest industries represented in my very own inventory portfolio proper now.
Jon Quast: I believe I hear Matt saying, possibly some good bargains on the market within the homebuilder class. Simply be sure you’re taking that long-term view and never get dissatisfied with short-term outcomes. After the break, we’ll speak concerning the rise of passive investing. You are listening to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing.
Welcome again to Motley Idiot Hidden Gems Investing. One fast word. We wish to make you a part of the dialog. In case you have any questions for Matt, Rachel, myself, something having to do with this present, you may e mail us at podcast@idiot.com, and we might love to listen to from you. We might like to learn your questions on air. Bear in mind to maintain them Silly. That e mail once more is podcast@idiot.com, podcast@idiot.com.
We’re going to the Mailbag as we speak, and this query got here in from a listener named Alex. I needed to tighten it up just a little bit. It was lengthy, and there have been a number of questions embedded, however here is my finest try at summarizing this query for the podcast right here. There’s been an enormous shift from lively investing to passive index funds during the last 25 years. How has that modified how the inventory market behaves? The query right here is, does the automated shopping for of index funds assist prop up the market and make the bull runs longer in the course of the good occasions? In a crash, does it make the ground stronger as a result of individuals go away the cash alone or does it make issues worse? What does passive investing do to market dynamics? That is actually the center of the query right here. Simply to ensure we’re all clear, you may put money into firms immediately. That is extra of the lively investing, or you may simply purchase an index fund or an ETF, which personal the shares. That is extra of the passive angle. Rachel, we’ll you first right here.
Rachel Warren: There’s a couple of methods to consider this. Market cap indexes allocate capital primarily based strictly on an organization’s dimension. Computerized retirement contributions find yourself flowing disproportionately into actually a handful of these massive mega-cap shares. Within the brief time period, that may create a self-reinforcing loop that may prop up a few of the index valuations and lengthen bull markets, even when the broader economic system begins to melt. However the flip aspect of that’s throughout a downturn, that could be a system that may introduce some fragility. Now, if traders begin pulling cash out, index managers are compelled to unload underlying shares to boost that money. Now, as a result of the pool of lively inventory pickers has shrunk fairly a bit over the previous couple of many years, there aren’t essentially at all times sufficient particular person consumers to soak up that promoting strain. The structural shift that you could see in these durations, it could flip these normal corrections into possibly sharper sell-offs, significantly if sure firms that numerous market traders observe. However the silver lining right here, the automated promoting actually drives down costs no matter an organization’s precise monetary well being. As long-term traders, we all know it is necessary to actually deal with the underlying well being of the enterprise that usually drives outperforming outcomes over the long term. I believe in case you’re a affected person investor, you are targeted on the basics, these distortions can create glorious entry factors into actually high-quality cash-flowing companies, however completely, there may be an influence, and it is actually necessary to know how that may trickle down into the shares that you simply personal.
Matt Frankel: I agree with most of what Rachel mentioned. I’ll push again on one factor, and that is that the pool of lively inventory pickers has shrunk during the last 25 years. Sure, by way of the variety of individuals buying and selling actively, that is completely true. However on the similar time, it is grow to be exponentially simpler to commerce. You are seeing increased volumes on a per-person foundation. Pondering, what did you pay fee for a inventory in 2000 in comparison with as we speak? I believe $14.99 is what I used to pay. Automated funding platforms have made it a lot simpler to simply set your commerce. Folks may very well be buying and selling whereas they’re at work with out even taking a look at their techniques. Algorithmic buying and selling platforms, the buying and selling frequency has grow to be much more. However that is all to say. The entire cause I am pushing again is to not decide on Rachel. It is to say that there is proof to either side of that query.
Does computerized shopping for prop up the market? How does it have an effect on the market, issues like that? For instance, there was Harvard analysis accomplished that claims the common inventory reacts much less to earnings than it did 20 years in the past, and that is due to the entire index funds and passive investing that does not instantly react to earnings experiences. There’s proof that shares in the identical index, say, the S&P 500, have a tendency to maneuver extra in sync than they did years in the past, as a result of index funds are shopping for and promoting them like a basket as Rachel appropriately identified. It is also clear that getting added to or dropped from an index can transfer a inventory far more than it did 20 years in the past. However however, a few of the most revered index fund leaders like Jack Bogle, who, sadly, is now not with us, have often argued that passive indexing largely would not have an effect on inventory costs. It is a robust query to reply, however one issues clear. The rise of index funds is actual, and it has dramatically modified sure dynamics of the inventory market in a number of large methods.
Jon Quast: Matt, I’ll throw you a shock query right here on the finish. That is the ultimate phrase. Does it make up one thing that you simply take note of with your personal investing course of? Why or why not?
Matt Frankel: Sure, however not for the explanations you may assume. It is as a result of I invested numerous firms which might be on the cusp of being added to a few of the larger indexes. I am extra of a small-cap investor than most individuals are right here across the Motley Idiot. I had two shares in my portfolio added to the S&P 500 inside the previous yr. I take note of it for these causes. The S&P 500 index funds, the Vanguard model, has over a trillion {dollars} of capital invested in all of it by itself. There are three firms which have owned 20% of the S&P as a result of via their passive index funds. When an organization jumps from a smaller index just like the Russell 2000 or the S&P Mid Cap 400 to the S&P 500, it actually can have a huge impact on their share costs. Not that it is a large a part of my funding thesis, however for sure firms in my portfolio being added or faraway from an index is unquestionably one thing I watch.
Jon Quast: We’ll undoubtedly take a bounce on that information if we will. That is on a regular basis that now we have for as we speak.
As at all times, individuals on this system could have curiosity within the shares they speak about, and The Motley Idiot could have formal suggestions for or towards, so do not buy or promote shares primarily based solely on what you hear. All private finance content material follows Motley Idiot editorial requirements and isn’t accredited by advertisers. Ads are sponsored content material and offered for informational functions solely. To see our full promoting disclosure, please try our present notes. Because of our producer Dan Boyd and the remainder of The Motley Idiot workforce behind the glass. For Matt, Rachel, and myself, thanks a lot for listening to our present as we speak, and we’ll see you subsequent time.
Jon Quast has positions in Superior Micro Units. Matt Frankel, CFP has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. Rachel Warren has no place in any of the shares talked about. The Motley Idiot has positions in and recommends Superior Micro Units, Berkshire Hathaway, Intel, Nvidia, and Qualcomm. The Motley Idiot has a disclosure coverage.
Nvidia’s Subsequent Massive Progress Lever? was initially printed by The Motley Idiot
